[Xitami] Xitami/5 - new project announcement

[Francis Turner]

I have, for the most part, moved to lighttpd now that I've migrated to
linux. I'd be quite happy to move back to a Xitami server if it
presented clear benefits with regards to perl and/or PHP integration.

(I'm assuming that the new Xitami will be at least as good as the old
one when it comes to static content)

Francis

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Magnus Wedberg <mw at 9000.org> wrote:
> Paul Reid wrote, On 2009-01-06 01:06:
>> Interesting, but: why do we need another HTTP server?
>
> I think this is a good question.
>
>>  > we need a small, tough server
>>
>> OK. I'll suggest that Apache is reasonably tough and small enough to run
>> on very modest machines.
>
> For static serving, Xitami is much faster than Apache, significantly
> more lightweight, and handles multiple requests like a champ. However,
> now there is lighttpd which is actively developed for this very role. If
> you want to pay there is litespeed which is apache compatible but much
> faster.
>
>
> --
> Magnus Wedberg
> http://www.magnuswedberg.com/
> mw AT 9000.org
> Warning! Objects in viewfinder may be closer than they appear.
>
>
> --
> Xitami Users Mailing List -- For Xitami support
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.xitami.org/mailman/listinfo/xitami
>



-- 
http://www.di2.nu/blog.htm
Faber's Fourth Law:
  Necessity is the mother of strange bedfellows.